Bachido Blogcast E12

Blog Blogcast
#21

Eric has a great point. I’m sure tsugaru shamisen wouldn’t have been made if similar discussion didn’t happen back then. No doubt, this is a controversial topic, especially for those who are locked into the current paradigm (most of those people probably aren’t excited about gaijin playing shamisen anyway :wink: ). This is why I stress that these future models are not meant to replace the current shamisen, but to stand along side it, as an additional way to unlock the most potential of the player. After all, there is an incredible variety of guitars out there. Why not shamisen? :wink:

Karl:
Actually, Masahiro’s dou is supersized. :wink: The estimate size for beginner tsugaru shamisen are 四部大 (Size four), standard tsugaru is 五部大 (Size 5). Masahiro’s shamisen is 七部大 (Size seven)! Only maybe 2 centimeters larger, but that adds up and does affect the wrist.
But I digress. Rounding the bottom of the dou, good idea! Do you mean the same roundness as a banjo, or still having a squareness to it?

Just had a thought. What about having a broad, hooked attachment (probably made out of plastic) that connects to the bottom of the dou, and acts as a stabilizer when rested on the leg?

Having a thin necked shamisen would be a cool model to have. When we get into the designing stage, we can think of ways to make it work in reality. Perhaps a truss rod?

Man, this would be such an awesome thing to have a conference about.

1 Like
#22

Liam: Ah, I see! Perhaps you could try something like this to make it tighter next time. - Redirecting...
Sandwich the skin between two pieces of wood and then tightly bolt them together so the skin can’t slip out. Have holes drilled into the wood so the rope can be fed through. This way, the skin can be pulled tighter without the risk of the rope ripping through the skin (as the pressure would be spread out more. Perhaps that can make it a bit tighter.

As for the shamisen itself, I guess if you add a string you kinda gotta change the “MI” in “SHAMISEN” :P.

Actually, the ‘Sha’ would be the thing to change. :wink: 三(three) 味(“flavor”) 線(line) But hey, anything is possible with a TM on the name. :wink: Katou san has the Mugen21 (Dream String 21) shamisen, Masahiro is making a shorter shamisen called the “KoShamisen” (little shamisen). What’s to stop us from having a “Yomisen”? :stuck_out_tongue: (四味線)

Ah yes, the Suberenai itomaki! (すべれない糸巻き) I’ve only seen them on Katou’s site, but haven’t used them in person (三味線専門店 三味線かとう) I still wonder how they work. :wink:

1 Like
#23

I don’t know if this image will help since my drawing skill is not among the top in the world.

http://www.filfyren.se/dl/852654shamisenrounded.png

Basically that the shamisen bottom follows the curve of the thigh, and having a rubber patch on the whole area for maximum contact. Of course this may make the shamisen look ridiculous, but I’m sure that one can come up with a design that looks good. You can of course change the other parts of the dou so that it fits it even more.

#24

I don’t know if this image will help since my drawing skill is not among the top in the world.

Lol. Awesome.

I would really like to see more unique tenjin and itomaki.
I always wanted a tenjin shaped like a skull or maybe one that split into two goat horns.
Also I think inlay would be the next coolest thing.
I’m sure there are more…

#25

I think some sort of apparatus to help beginners balance might not be a bad idea, but it’s kind of a toss up in my mind, because I don’t think it’s good to become dependent on those sorts of things. Personally, I’m a big fan of the shape of the dou. What exactly are the differences between dou sizes though?

Some inlays in the neck could be cool.

I’m all over the Yomisen idea in whatever shape it might take.

#26

I hear you, but body changes are not always evil. I prefer

http://www.guitarfactory.net/Images/Taylor/Lge/Taylor_210ce_Acoustic_Guitar.jpg

over

Although this body change allows you to play higher notes (which a rounded dou won’t), it’s essentially a body change that made something better/easier.

I also like the idea of inlays. I love guitars with a premium colored line along the edge of the neck. Tenjin and itomaki also have a lot of potential, although maybe two goat horns is a bit extreme! Just don’t make a pike… That is about the ugliest guitar head I have ever seen.

#27

Hi,

Wow that looks kool, but I can’t make the rest of the set in my apartment, its sucks. Plus the last time I went near a saw was in high school :p．

Damnit, I genuinely always forget that the 三 is read as sha here because it would make sense if it was read as み.

On that note, if you were gonna be hardcore enough to add an extra string, you could go with the name 死三線/四三線 (shimisen)。I’m guessing anyone who is superstitious wouldn’t go near it though!

#28

I also prefer cutaway guitars. Like I said, I don’t see having an accessory that essentially serves as training wheels as a bad idea, actually changing the dou to conform to the leg seems like something that would add a lot of cost without a whole lot of benefit, as I haven’t found balancing the shamisen to be all that difficult. If there’s enough demand for the option, and someone willing to make it, I don’t see why not though. I’d me more concerned about it sounding funny.

I’m more interested in changes that will push the instrument to uncharted territory rather than make it more accessible though, so there’s my bias.

Aesthetically speaking, I favor the minimalist design of the instrument, but some inlays would be cool as long as they aren’t gaudy.

I think the reading of 四味線 would actually be “shimisen” following convention, but “yomisen” I think is a little more distinctive. Also, I’m not Japanese, so it’s whatever.

#29

Maybe it will sound better :slight_smile: You mention the cost, and I think that may be why it looks the way it does today. I don’t think there have been many tests with changing the body into weird shapes as skinning would be more troublesome. Changing the body into a way that still allows for easy skinning could achieve an even better sound, but we don’t know that. I agree that the cost vs. benefit might be discouraging in this case. I can hold the shamisen with one arm today, but I don’t feel that I can move my right arm freely while doing it, and that is what I want to improve.

#30

I don’t know about better, but it would definitely sound different. Whether that’s good or bad is up to the person, I guess. Personally I’d still want it to sound as much like a shamisen as possible tone-wise.
So… wait, you want to be able to move your right arm freely?

Also guys, bass shamisen? Anyone?

#31

oooooooooh a baritone shamisen, a bari-shami, nice one eric. With little bachi finger picks, like tsume for the sanshin

#32

“Better sound” is all relevant.
To me it is a matter of improving ones tone and mastery of the instrument to better emulate the best players.
It isnt so much that we want to heavily augment what already creates a beautiful sound, but that we should be looking to create new sound.
It seems to be more of a western idea to change an aspect of something in order to eliminate a hurdle which could otherwise be cleared through hard work. Often times this had lead to amazing advancements in society or technology. Other times it causes us to lose out on nuances and the fine technicalities and characteristics of art.
For instance: radar, gps, compasses, maps, etc. VS native american tracking and surv ival skills handed down through the generations. There is no arguing that one is easier and more accessible, the question really is, which would you rather have? And what enables you to properly learn and perform the real skills you need? Which do you respect?
The same analogy can be applied many things, including budo.
So all in all, we must make sure to innovate, but also keep in mind what will ensure the survival of our art and the wisdom that comes along with learning the way we currently learn it.
The balance must be maintained.

#33

Of course, at some point innovation may transform what you used to have into something very different. I have heard a lot of people born in the 50’s who complain about today’s music and say all good music was made in the 70’s. I love music regardless of what time it was created, but I see their point. What I mean to say is that today we have a lot of genres and even though they are all connected in some way, we still consider them to be different. So what defines the shamisen? To me it’s the distinct buzzing sound and resonance created by bridge against the skin. Add another string? It’s still a shamisen to me as is a 9 stringed guitar. If you take it to the extreme, you could make the shamisen into a mind controlled sound generating apparatus where you just think the notes. I would think that is cool and useful, but that is too far from how the original instrument is played that I would call it something different, like Shamindsen.

I would rather have both the GPS and the native american tracking skills, so the balance you mention should in the best of worlds be both. They are all good in different situations.

I don’t think we have any disagreement here and it seems we are approaching the question with different perspectives. The question wasn’t “what do we need to do to make the shamisen popular world-wide?” but more “what can we do to evolve the shamisen into something better/different?”

The good thing is that it doesn’t matter to someone who thinks idea X is bad if some people try it out. From what I’ve read of the stuff people dislike about the modernization of songs played on the shamisen, I just think that they should stick to what they like. It’s very selfish to be angry with a tradition dying out because something new is more approachable and cool. Of course, if you have a strong opinion that you KNOW is right, you will be exactly this. Like the last native american in a family who wants to pass on the great old knowledge, but is met with no interest. He knows that if all electricity on Earth stops working, his skills will be needed. Just like how computer musicians would equally be screwed because they don’t know how to play all the instruments they used as recorded samples.

Anyways, I think the bass shamisen idea sounds excellent. It would be really interesting to hear the sound of thicker strings on a bigger dou. We’re gonna need strong forearms, and big bachis though!

#34

great artwork, Karl :slight_smile: also I am sure I would be thrilled to see or even play a little shamisen or koshamisen or ukusen (royalty free) I also like all the other ideas or that there are a lot of ideas I hope I did not come across as wanting to “kill” that 4 string idea I just for me personally I like the shamisen to have 3 strings that characteristic and how songs are played on those is just one aspect of shamisen I like very much so I would not buy a 4 string but would not have any problem with it being available too . . . :slight_smile:

#35

Man, you guys are too much for me. I fear I’m gonna get steamrolled if I miss even one day of correspondence. :wink:

Karl: First off, I am a huge fan of the exhaust pipe. :smiley: Got a surprised LOL from me. :wink:
As for the curve, I see what you mean! That design had actually crossed my mind last week. Of course, testing would have to be done to see if the thinner area would affect the overall sound (I would doubt it, but who knows), but I think it’s very doable and would look cool. Probably only two inches (the middle part of the dou which the kawa doesn’t cover) would be enough to notice improvements and still look classy.

By the way, Kevin, Grant and I went to Aomori city to see one of Chikuzan Takahashi’s top students preform. I swear, her forearm was deformed to the shape of her doukake. She lifted her arm up to show everyone. I was blown away.

Oooh!!! Bass shamisen!!! That is an awesome idea!!! They’ve got Bass kotos, why not Bass shamisen? :wink: Fantastic idea! As well as the shamiukes. :slight_smile: Last year, a ukulele luthier in Hawaii sent me some shots of a shamiuke he made (inspired by the shamisen). Unfortunately, I lost the original email, but it looked quite legit.

I quickly skimmed this thread 'cause I gotta go haul some bamboo (literally) now, but I’ll have a chance to read everything later. You guys carry on. This thread needs an awesomeness exhaust pipe! :smiley:

#36

Grant: I don’t know about you, but I’m gonna have a shamisen with goat horns in our metal band. You can have dibs on the skull.

#37

okay i’ve so dropped from this conversation :smiley: so im not even gonna try to read and understand all this :DDD

#38

Thank you all for your kind words regarding my art.

So she had only one forearm which was big? Hmm, maybe that should be a topic then - how to build your shamisen muscles. Maybe you guys should try getting an interview with her? :slight_smile:

If we connect the excess awesomeness exhaust pipe to another player that is less skilled, then he can make use of that awesomeness. In the end everyone benefits!

#39

Just to show that there is nothing new under the sun, here are some pictures from a book published in 1936.

Either this is a really big shamisen or those are some very small people:
Imgur

Here’s a four-stringed ‘shami-lele’, with optional bow:
Imgur

#40

I really do like the bass shamisen. I have seen one that a man was playing in Kanagi a few years ago. He had modified a normal Tsugaru Shamisen to accommodate thicker strings, which gave it that deep bassy flavor.

As far as the conversation goes on new ideas for the shamisen, I will try to simplify my point:
Let us innovate, and create new sound; summon new ideas into the world. And while doing so, we remember what makes the style unique, and what tonality can be lost if we aren’t mindful of the soul of the instrument.

(to use an analogy through art)

For years we painted with fingers.
For years we painted with brushes.
For years we painted with machines.

Shamisen is still being played with a brush, and has started to slowly move over to machine.
All of painting, technically, is arguably the same. However there is a point where you have to recognize the art within each, and in doing so, recognize that they are vastly different.
I have played both acoustic and electric extensively, and they are so massively different, it’s quite interesting.

Anyway, I want a four-stringed, double-necked, goat-horned shamisen, don’t get me wrong. I wanted one 7 years ago, and still do, lol.
I am a bit more than hesitant on spending time to attempt to make them “easier to play” though.

Please don’t mistake this perspective as one that rejects change or new styles of playing… trust me, I am a student of Kevin Kmetz, I don’t think I could ever assume such a mindset, haha.

© 2020 Kyle Abbott