“Looking at the shape between the neck and the dou, I agree with Minyo.”
This is confusing me a bit, wasn’t the consensus that it’s a juita shamisen?
I’m not sure what style I’m learning, the course is offered by my university and I decided to take it because it looked really interesting. We’re learning in this old japanese style house in the Gion district and the guy usually doesn’t teach, mostly just works as a performer. I think he’s a relatively a big name here in Kansai area in the shamisen circle. I had a real trouble understanding him in the first few classes so it’s embarrassing but I don’t know his name. I’ll figure it out in next class with some classic misdirection like “how do you write your name in kanji?”
Hey again, Alexander,
I’m not sure why Jacinthe is saying min’yo, maybe she could explain a little more? Here’s some elaboration on my end.
These days, jiuta and min’yo necks look very similar.
Traditionally, the former lacks an azuma-sawari. Primarily there are two reasons: the azuma-sawari is rather modern and jiuta music has little need for it.
In brief, this has to do with the musical traditions surrounding jiuta and the more regular tuning found in it. By comparison, min’yo has to change to match the singer so more flexibility is generally required. This is what Muramatsu-san told me just the other week at his shop in Toyama, anyway.
That said, modern jiuta occasionally have them.
As Kyle mentioned, the itomaki on a jiuta tend to be slim as well. More in line with thin nagauta, rather than the flaring handful of tsugaru. Min’yo itomaki have a bit more heft, although not as much as tsugaru. When I get home today, I’ll try and post a picture to illustrate this.
The exact reasoning for it is beyond me, but I’m uncertain the genesis of shamisen music and the heaviness of strings have something to do with it. Someone better read than I probably has the answer.
To be honest, the difference in instrument between the two genres is slim.
Jiuta usually have bigger bodies, heftier bachi, and wider koma. But each of these change the sound only slightly. It’s only by combining all of them with careful playing that the difference arises.
I would be inclined to call your shamisen a jiuta because of the accessories and circumstances. Kyoto has a long history of Jiuta. (Kyoujamisen is a local variant, but that’s another can of worms)